Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Int’l v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
” See, Arvizu v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
We do not know if the tweets motivated the students to perform at a higher level. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:32 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
MGN and Steve McClaren v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
The district court also rejected Hobbs' "unique combination" argument because it interpreted the law, as stated in Peters v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
The Court of Appeal reverses the trial court and holds that Santa Monica isn't required to move from at-large voting for council members to district-level voting. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:56 am
In Barksdale v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The case (Sanders v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:31 pm
The Court in Carter v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
The stay application (Family PAC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Profound disagreement existed among our citizens over the issue—as it does over other issues, such as the death penalty—but that disagreement was being worked out at the state level. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
The European Court of Justice in its Judgment in Joined Cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
It would require a multi-factorial inquiry in relation to each application, for example to assess the level of destitution. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am
Explaining the level of the award, Sir David Eady stated that the allegations were distinctive and very serious, going to the “core attributes” of the Claimant’s personality. [read post]
