Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7381 - 7400 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The IRS doesn’t require third party reporting for virtual currency (yet) so there’s no form 1099-B or equivalent issued at the end of the year. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
You can’t predict what pleadings the other side may file, or the pace of the court’s schedule. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:55 am by Robichaud
The canaries aren’t singing.If there was a proverbial canary in a coal mine, it is that of set-date court. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:04 am by David Oxenford
So don’t get caught by missing some deadline – and take you opportunity to comment on important matters pending before the FCC. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
De la sorte, la prévention numéro trois avait été abandonnée. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 41(b)(2)-(6). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:34 am by Gene Quinn
(B) For each challenged claim, propose a reasonable number of substitute claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:34 am by Gene Quinn
(B) For each challenged claim, propose a reasonable number of substitute claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:29 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In this respect, a discrepancy between this embodiment and the claimed subject-matter appears in the terminology used. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
I’ve also spoken extensively on the topic with state officials, and authored a frequently cited article on the parallels between the physical presence standard and the “minimum contacts” standard of personal jurisdiction, Why the Quill Physical Presence Rule Shouldn’t Go the Way of Personal Jurisdiction, 46 State Tax Notes 387 (2007). [read post]