Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
If it does so again in the S.B. 8 litigation, it will not allow Texas or any other state to circumvent or defy its own constitutional precedents that, at least for now, remain on the books.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:15 am
Massimo Sperindeo (Case C 144/12) on the impact of opposition to a European Order of Payment on jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
or(b) must the Community design court rely on national law governing designs in accordance with Article 88(2) ["On all matters not covered by this Regulation, a Community design court shall apply its national law, including its private international law" -- but Art. 14(1) does apply so there should be no need to lose sleep over this, surely?] [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:23 pm
People argued that New York County has "particular effect" jurisdiction pursuant to CPL 20.40 (2) (c). [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:52 am
Ryan C. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
By Dale C. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
This is the substantive difference between an ethical-religious imposition that applies “no matter what,” and a principle of freedom under which a person must accept the possibility of losing that freedom if they choose not to respect the rules. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
It’s the one matter I will never compromise on. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morritt C and Lords Justices Jacob and Lloyd) has given its decision in Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd; Nova Productions Ltd v Bell Fruit Games Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 219, an appeal from the decision of Kitchin J which was noted by the IPKat here.In short, this appeal concerned two actions. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
If it does so again in the S.B. 8 litigation, it will not allow Texas or any other state to circumvent or defy its own constitutional precedents that, at least for now, remain on the books.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
It’s the one matter I will never compromise on. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Had it not been for “the overwhelming proof of guilt in this matter, this repeated mischaracterization would have constituted plain and prejudicial error. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 11:21 pm
One of the hot topics for mainstream P&C insurers these days is dealing with “silent cyber” – that is, the coverage for cyber-related losses in traditional property and casualty insurance policies. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Seeing that a sister legal system responds dissimilarly yet successfully to some of the common challenges we face should open up a world of possibilities.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:27 pm
The Resource Center Purports to be a “[c]omplete source for leading-edge content and online resources relating to the ethics of legal outsourcing. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
Richard C. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:47 pm
by Lawrence C. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 8:55 pm
Brian C. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:38 am
The judge may hear and determine such matters out of the presence or hearing of the jury. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:37 am
Rule 2.9 (C), a judge should not view a party’s or witnesses’ pages on a social networking site and should not use social networking sites to obtain information regarding the matter before the judge. [read post]
