Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 70,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
A divided Board panel affirmed a refusal to register the collective membership mark STEELWORKERS for "indicating membership of a[n] (sic) labor organization," finding the mark highly descriptive of the membership of Applicant's organization, and Applicant's evidence of acquired distinctiveness insufficient to overcome the refusal. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
Are you aware of other cases where social media has played a part in affecting a trademark dispute? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:32 am
In any case, this evidence does not show that Triumph's use of its COACH marks for test-prep materials was not substantially exclusive.The Board therefore found that Triumph's use of its marks "has made an impact on the purchasing public in the field of educational materials for preparing standardized tests as an indication of origin and has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:02 am
"Applicant contended that this case is similar to the Maria Callas case [TTABlogged here], in which a Section 2(a) false association refusal was reversed because there was no evidence that any entity with rights in the deceased singer’s name existed. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Nedim Malovic reported on the case. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:06 pm
In a rare case of double-WYHA? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
Why is eye popping quality not the hall mark of the consumer bankruptcy bar? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Where a trader which is a competitor of the proprietor of a registered trade mark and which sells goods and provides services identical to those covered by the trade mark via its website (i) selects a sign which is identical (in accordance with the Court's ruling in Case C-291/00 [LTJ Diffusion SA v Sadas Vertbaudet SA, the Arthur et Felicie case]) with the trade mark as a keyword for a search engine operator's sponsored link service, (ii)… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:27 am
An interesting little decision on the mechanics of proof of use of trade mark cropped up in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities last Friday in Case Tâ€â [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 8:29 am
Not content with deluging the IP public with Community trade mark decisions yesterday, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities is hard at it again today.First today the Kat considers Case Tâ€â [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:02 am
Seuss case.) [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:08 pm
Next up in the first round of CIRM 2.0 awards is final action on a $5 million award to Shaomei Wang of Cedars-Sinai that was also approved on May 21 by CIRM directors.Mills said last Friday that CIRM 2.0 has not been perfect and that in some cases implementation required "brute force. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm
What is unusual about this case is that the ACCC’s assessment includes both an assessment of the certification rules on their own merit, as well as an assessment of the rules in light of the trade marks applied for and the impression the trade marks will convey to consumers. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm
What is unusual about this case is that the ACCC’s assessment includes both an assessment of the certification rules on their own merit, as well as an assessment of the rules in light of the trade marks applied for and the impression the trade marks will convey to consumers. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
.), 2010 Markman 3064403 I will ignore the patent claims in this case and focus only on the Lanham Act/false marking counterclaims. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
If you've been so busy this week that you're having kittens, here's the summary of the IP news you missed:Trade Marks and GIsHaving kittens. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
These marks are very worrying for me. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Remember the Mardi Gras bead dog case, Nola Spice, in which the PTO accidentally accepted a Section 15 incontestability statement during the pendency of an appeal of an order cancelling the mark, even though the notice of suit was on file? [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
No, said the court, there was no passing off, but yes, there had been trade mark infringement. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
The review looked at whether allowing scandalous marks in the Brunetti case may open the floodgate on registrations.IPlens reviews the recent case between Peppa Pig and Tobbia, where a registration for an apparently-similar Tapir was cancelled. [read post]
