Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 14,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Lorang, 992 P.2d 496, 501 (Wash. 2000) (rejecting the view that a ban on “profane” speech could be subject to lower scrutiny as a content-neutral restriction). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:54 am
With more than 7,600 locations, it isn’t surprising that CVS is the largest pharmacy chain in the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Just stating the issue so straightforwardly we cannot help but conclude that you can’t do that. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
Antecedentes penales Peticionarios: Nelson Rodríguez Sepúlveda y Gabriel Soler Quiñones Título: Para enmendar los Artículos 1, 2, 3 y 6 de la Ley Núm. 254 de 27 de julio de 1974, según enmendada, para disponer que los delitos menos graves estarán excluidos de los Certificados de Antecedentes Penales, exceptuando los determinados por reglamentación aprobada por el Secretario de Justicia por motivo de política… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:21 pm
The cases in Ohio ate chicken liver pâté while visiting Oregon. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:53 pm
” (Wilcox, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 979.) [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:34 pm
Aún no descubro la verdadera razón[2]. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:34 am
Ele foi aprovado para escrevente técnico judiciário em 1988, contudo, exercia a função de contador judicial – à qual foi designado por meio de uma portaria no mesmo ano em que tomou posse – havia mais de 20 anos. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm
La règle 103 CBE, relative au remboursement de la taxe de recours, a été modifiée, avec effet au 1er avril 2014.La règle actuelle prévoit que la taxe de recours est remboursée dans 2 cas:i) lorsqu'il est fait droit au recours et que le remboursement apparaît équitable du fait d'un vice substantiel de procédure ouii) lorsque le recours est retiré avant le dépôt du… [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Le 2 septembre suivant, une lettre d’entente a été signée entre la GRC et Tremblay. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:30 pm
O memorial da Bernauer Strasse conta boa parte da história da Europa que aconteceu entre 1961 e 1989. 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 3:40 pm
Or, are things like minority rights, regional representation, sober second thought, protection from tyranny, and broad representation no longer important t to us, or less important than they once were? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:12 am
But York wasn’t defending the religious belief. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The three factors are: (1) whether the Windsor opinion considered post-hoc rationalizations for DOMA—hypothetical purposes that might conceivably justify the law—or instead focused only on the actual goals Congress relied upon in enacting the statute; (2) whether the Windsor opinion required that there be a “legitimate” state interest to “justify” the effect of the law; and (3) whether the cases that were cited in Windsor themselves applied rational-basis… [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
En particular, quisimos detener la contribución especial de 2% impuesta a individuos que prestan servicios o llevan a cabo industria o negocio por cuenta propia y generan ingresos brutos en exceso de $200,000. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:19 pm
But the First District Illinois Appellate Court denied Arena’s request to dismiss the appeal because: [Arena] misconstrue[d] both the nature of plaintiff’s [Garrido’s] postjudgment filings and the standard by which the circuit [trial] court must evaluate postjudgment motions … [T]he new [2-1203] motion merely corrected the relevant statutory citations in the first [2-1401] motion. [read post]
