Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 8:52 pm
Second, the United States is no ordinary litigant. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
But also I can tell you just from personal experience, I remember Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
" There is simply no reason to allow Vermont, the second-smallest state (behind Wyoming) in population and number 50 in terms of Gross State Product, to have the same voting power in the Senate as does Texas or California. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:50 pm
No, said the Ninth Circuit yesterday in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:51 am
While Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ("YGR") of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had some great moments during the Epic Games v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
California, 489 U.S. 121, 129 (1989) (citing The Mayor v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
United States, in which the Court is considering the scope of Congress’s treaty power, and contends that the Chief Justice’s opinions in cases involving foreign affairs “might have lasting significance for foreign relations law that rivals or even surpasses” those of other Justices regarded as leaders in the field. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 5:28 am
United States and the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
Calif. 2006) may have summed up the overall state of the law best - "Article I of the United States Constitution provides that neither Congress nor any state shall pass an ex post facto law. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, (U.E.) [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:57 pm
For the factual background of this Apple v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:05 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 5:37 pm
(But not restitution).United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:31 am
Also, one of Apple's prayers for relief relates to injunctions: it asks the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to order an anti-suit injunction against Acacia and Conversant. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:24 pm
“[United States v.] [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
