Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 22,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2016, 5:35 am
Last month, in Welch v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
After Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:42 am
White v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
DONET V. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:46 pm
In Lepis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner (1989) and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:30 am
White v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
., an agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers generally should be upheld if not unreasonable or irrational," citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, leave to appeal dismissed, 20 NY3d 995. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
., an agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers generally should be upheld if not unreasonable or irrational," citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, leave to appeal dismissed, 20 NY3d 995. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 7:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:10 am
Gordon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:09 am
" Mattera v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:15 pm
Finding that Harkness failed to meet her burden of establishing that either of her acts were protected activity under the Act, the Court granted C-Bass' motion for summary judgment.The full opinion is available in PDF. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am
The plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the defamatory statements were not substantially accurate and therefore false. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
Moreover, the burden of demonstrating an implied waiver falls on the state, which was unable to meet it in this case. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
