Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 27,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:49 am
Code § 922(g)(1). [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
Code, § 402; People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Lane v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
The opinion is styled, Richard Conrad and Brenda Conrad v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:48 am
The Bankruptcy Code (U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:47 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:15 am
Code § 25019. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 11:00 am
The case is Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm
The State of Massachusetts is requiring every business that owns or licenses the Personal Information (more on the definitions below) of Massachusetts residents to have such a plan. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm
The State of Massachusetts is requiring every business that owns or licenses the Personal Information (more on the definitions below) of Massachusetts residents to have such a plan. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
C068747 Drake v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
Code 1975, Section 13A-5-46. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:52 pm
Koblitz —Well, it’s official: The Federal Circuit decision in GSK v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:45 am
It’s too bad the United States Supreme Court didn’t issue its ruling in Comptroller v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:00 pm
Yesterday, an interesting opinion was handed down by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Perez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
Although contribution limits (ubiquitous in both state and federal codes) themselves remain untouched in Thursday’s decision, it has now become more difficult to justify them. [read post]
