Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Amir Sitafalwalla v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:12 pm
Health Care Preposterous Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada stated that: “A doctor’s behaviour must be assessed in light of the conduct of other ordinary specialists, who possess a reasonable amount of knowledge, competence and skill expected of professionals in Canada, in that field. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
" (Tolisano v Texon, 144 AD2d 267, 271 [1st Dept 1988, Smith, J., dissenting] [citing Newin], revd for reasons stated in dissent 75 NY2d 732 [1989].) [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
This is worth noting as it seems to flow from the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaoulli v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
" Cobbs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
That is, our first meeting with our clients is after a car wreck, injury from a doctor's negligence, or the like. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:11 am
The best legal writer around, Judge Frank Easterbrook, provides clarity in the April 1 decision Back Doctors Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Castelli v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:47 am
In Hammond v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm
Nealon issued an Opinion in the medical malpractice case of Lasavage v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
By Daniel RichardsonChase v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:45 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:48 am
Mahana placed a disclaimer on his invoices to Antonio stating that the system did not provide a sufficient basis to establish a relationship between a doctor and a patient. . . . [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:42 am
The recent decision of Awalt v. [read post]
