Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7381 - 7400 of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The Court adopted the findings of the court below, the Third District Court of Appeal, which held as follows: “the statute’s disparate treatment of medical malpractice wrongful deaths does bear a rational relationship to the legitimate state interest of ensuring the accessibility of medical care to Florida residents by curtailing the skyrocketing medical malpractice insurance premiums in Florida. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:25 am by Daniel E. Cummins
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Pennington v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Ray Dowd
The district court had little trouble in concluding that the owner's “relinquishment of his property was anything but voluntary,” 529 F.Supp.2d at 307, and that holding was not challenged on appeal.Similarly, in Menzel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am by Jeff Welty
Besides changing the name of the condition, the bill seeks to conform the statute to the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Hall v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Plaintiff on liability; defense on damages - Commil v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
Last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its decision in Catholic Charities v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:27 pm by Josh Blackman
  I have agreed with the States challenging the ACA, who have won in the Federal district court and court of appeals, that the ACA, as amended, exceeds the power of the Congress. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am by SHG
First, the Court could enjoin any person who files suit under S.B. 8 from prosecuting his or her claim. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am by David Bernstein
Another factor that may have stunted the gatekeeping process is the growth of federal (and state) multi-district litigation (MDL). [read post]