Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 8,951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:55 pm
Stating that it disagreed with the Realty One ruling, Righthaven asserted that it was nevertheless moving to dismiss “in the interest of judicial economy. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Creditors and Debtors Rights Hess v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE KARENA WHERRY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
District Judge James M. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
In March 2004 the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Hancock, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, confirmed the award a few months later. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The first problem is that those cases coming before the courts have not yet required judicial interpretation of many of the new issues of fact and law arising from internet publication. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
In 1976, relying on principles of federalism, the Supreme Court, in National League of Cities v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:36 am
The First Circuit's opinion in Hutchinson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:55 pm
Mayo and the Future of Judicial Administrative Deference At first glance, the Mayo decision is a large hammer and sword for administrative agencies seeking further judicial deference to their rules and regulations. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:32 pm
In Galaviz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm
The first new decision is in the case Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. [read post]
