Search for: "State v. Liberty"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 9,935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 2:55 pm
The amendment seeks to undo the decision of the Supreme Court in Badal v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 7:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm
The case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 12:35 am
Do we really care more about money than we do about liberty? [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:41 am
In El Masri v Macedonia the complainant, Khalid El Masri (left)—a Lebanese national but German resident—will claim that Macedonia’s refusal to instigate a full and proper investigation of his rendition, together with the state’s direct involvement in the rendition itself, constitute a breach of the Convention. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
The Magna Carta made civil liberties for the masses possible. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
United States, Justice Anthony Kennedy – a key swing voter – emphasized that constitutional constraints on federal power protect “the liberty of the individual” as well as “state sovereignty. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 3:57 pm
His evidence for that startling proposition is, it turns out, completely non-existent: one case, United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Albert Snyder v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The group is, in effect, asking the Federal Government to order Texas to perform an act the state has refused, drawing some unlikely allies to its cause—including the American Civil Liberties Union, anti-abortion groups, and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 10:38 am
Bakke and Grutter v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am
United KingdomR (National Council for Civil Liberties) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
“Accordingly, 10(b) provides detainees with an opportunity to contact counsel in circumstances where they are deprived of liberty and in the control of the state, and thus vulnerable to the exercise of its power and in a position of legal jeopardy. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
For us in the United States, religious freedom is our “first freedom,” not in the sense that it happens to appear in our “First Amendment” but, more importantly, because the meaningful embrace and protection of political rights and civil liberties depends on the meaningful embrace and protection of religious freedom. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Meanwhile, at Guantánamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Little over four years later the House of Lords handed down the oft-cited and widely commented upon judgment in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘A’) holding that the power was incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
