Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
The same day the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:32 am
Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
As the Court put it in Grutter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
(This is not the standard in a minority of other states.)As applied to the bankers' contracts in Cardoni, the court found that Oklahoma's public policy against enforcement of employment non-compete agreements was "fundamental" on account of its state statute. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Although the case, Fisher v University of Texas at Austin (Dkt. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
, (December 8, 2015).From elsewhere:Samuel V. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
They are Hewitt v Rowlands (1924) 93 LJKB 1080, Calabar Properties v Stitcher [1984] 1 WLR 287 , Wallace v Manchester City Council (1998) 30 HLR 1111 and Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
(Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Dkt No 14-981, cert granted June 29, 2015). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:08 am
The effectiveness of affirmative action has never been the focus of the plaintiffs in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am
[v] U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am
Verrilli Jr. for the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 12:06 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
Holder – no state or local government is currently required to obtain preclearance at all. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
So what did the state do? [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:23 am
Desimini v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The Court stated that “minor perceived inconsistencies and omissions may be insufficient to support an adverse-credibility finding. [read post]
