Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 29,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 9:20 pm
Village Green at Sayville, LLC v Town of Islip, 2019 WL 4737054 (EDNY 9/27/2019) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:11 pm
" Nevada v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:33 pm
Opinion Shows FBI Engaged in Lawless, Unconstitutional Backdoor Searches of Americans These rulings arose from a routine operation of Section 702—the FISC’s annual review of the government’s “certifications,” the high-level descriptions of its plans for conducting 702 surveillance. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:41 pm
The panel reversed and remanded for further proceedings.CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE V. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
In Shah v Federbush, 2019 WL 5060496 ( S.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
” (Schlegel v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
” Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Without the Zeran v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am
The case of Egan v Canada [104] was a planned attack argued by my former constitutional law professor, Joe Arvay. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:23 pm
In a press release, HHS states these proposed rules are intended to “provide greater certainty for healthcare providers participating in value-based arrangements and providing coordinated care for patients . . . while maintaining strong safeguards to protect patients and programs from fraud and abuse. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
In that context, I remember how Judge Robart in Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:13 pm
Miller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
Unlike the 43 Federal and State exclusion databases which are publicly accessible, the CMS preclusion database is only available Medicare Advantage (Part C) and Part D payor plans have with a valid Health Plan ID been granted access to the preclusion database by CMS. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:56 am
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]