Search for: "State v. Save" Results 7381 - 7400 of 11,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 7:13 am by Steve Vladeck
In light of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari yesterday to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:05 am by Isabel McArdle
AHK and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1117 (Admin) – Read judgment Secrecy and secret justice are rarely out of the public eye. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Research & resources Aggravated with Aggregators: Can International Copyright Law Help Save the News Room? [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
 Pernod Ricard who has an agreement with Cuba state-owned company, Cubaexport, is permitted to sell the Havana Club rum in every country under its US trade mark name - HAVANA CLUB- save for the U.S. where the Cuban trade embargo on goods produced in Cuba is still alive and kicking. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:30 am by Ron Coleman
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB’s “knew or should have known” standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: from @wired: "It's Tinkerers v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
United States that Commerce lacked the legal authority to impose CVDs on NME imports. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Todd Ruger
Right now, Congress and most states have not enacted statutes to regulate how law enforcement can get access to the tracking data kept in more than 322 million smartphones and cellular phones in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Ariel Katz
Save for blatant cases of infringement, copyright owners might be reluctant to risk another CCH­-like outcome in borderline cases. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 andPinnock adopted. [read post]