Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7381 - 7400 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am by GPMfeeds
LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada captioned Chowdhury v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
Prudential Securities, Inc. (11th Cir. 1995) 59 F.3d 1186, 1192.)At some point, the United States Supreme Court may need to resolve this split.Full disclosure: I am currently handling an appeal, Raymond v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Thomas Kaufman
 It is possible that the California Supreme Court will feel greater need as a result of this decision to address the viability of Gentry when it eventually issues a decision in the Sonic-Calabasas case that the United States Supreme Court reversed last year (opinion expected no sooner than 2013). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:39 pm by Florian Mueller
But even if it weren't, the key findings in the Qualcomm case regarding component-level licensing and the smallest salable patent-practicing unit (SSPPU), and the conclusions Judge Koh had previously reached in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
This search was authorized by a warrant issued by a United States Magistrate Judge on April 11, 2009, based on an affidavit prepared by FBI Special Agent Nicholas G. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:07 pm by Keith Rizzardi
  On February 17, 2010, Plaintiff CBD filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California challenging the FWS's failure to act on the Tehachapi slender salamander and listing petitions for six additional species. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]