Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7381 - 7400 of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
 Except for some enlightened counties in Nevada, prostitution remains criminalized in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 am by Mark Summerfield
  (Decision: The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer – PDF). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm by Mark Movsesian
As Zalman Rothschild shows in a forthcoming study, judicial disagreements about Covid restrictions in the United States have closely tracked judges' partisan identities. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
None of the major ISPs in the United States, however, has signed on yet. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am by Just Security
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
    In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
Charles and many other cities throughout Illinois, as well as in Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
   Rick aptly calls this “the most banana republic moment in the United States I could recall in two and a half decades of professionally following elections” (p. 66). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
This is important because by one count there are close to 1,700 alleged human rights violators and war criminals here in the United States. [read post]
The court has come close to taking this step in previous LGBT cases such as Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
  Given how important our vote is for the most important office in the world, these communications raise huge issues and questions of what is allowed under the law.In 2010 the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:15 am by Chris Jones
Texas Tort Claims Act 42 U.S.Code §1983  provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory … subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in… [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:04 pm by Mike Delikat
  Orrick will be keeping a close eye on the myriad rulings that are sure to follow this landmark case. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]