Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 44,319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
After reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended Section 5000A is constitutional. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:44 am
On February 8, 2021, in cxLoyalty, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
More importantly, however, the proposal does not provide any guidance to determine when gross revenues are “in the state. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Textualism After Bostock Bostock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
” United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 7:28 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:42 pm
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:52 am
Huon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:21 am
On appeal, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
This presumption reflects the requirements of international law, whereby one State should not infringe upon the sovereignty of another, and the rule of comity, which is founded on mutual respect between States. 2. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:30 am
(Bell v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, ¶ 17.) [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
On August 13, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided that it is allowed so long as there is no likelihood of confusion under 15 U.S.C.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
We are not the first commentators to argue that this provision and its "Office . . . under the United States"-language does not extend to elected federal officials, including the presidency. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:38 am
Like this case.The case is South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
The ruling centers around two cases involving California churches South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
