Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
Part III-A held that the mandate could not be sustained under the commerce clause or the necessary and proper clause. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
The case is State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:16 am
, we reported that the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in City of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:43 am
It is American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Cuno, a 2006 case that held state taxpayer suits in federal court must meet the same criteria as federal taxpayer suits, and Hein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:07 am
HELD – The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
“Our Supreme Court has held Rule 28(b) to be a nonjurisdictional rule. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:37 am
In Herring v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
: GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on April 17, 1889. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 5:45 am
In Bair v. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm
Sir John Thomas stated that, following A-G v MGN [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin), the test is whether “publication would have given rise to a seriously arguable ground of appeal if the trial had been allowed to continue and proceeded to conviction”. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has held, in cases such as DeShaney v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:12 pm
Cascadia Wildlands v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today on Michigan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
The same, the Court held, applies to the difference between paper archives and digital archives. [read post]