Search for: "High v State" Results 7401 - 7420 of 35,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Written by Elijah Granet In a recent decision of the Family Division of the English and Welsh High Court—VB v TR (Re RR) [2020] EWFC  28, Mr Justice Mostyn highlighted a lacuna in the protection of children from abduction under the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (‘the Convention’). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:03 am
”The third condition, inextricably intertwined with the previous two above, is the “provision of public health services,” supported in the first instance by a national or federal government, in cooperation and collaboration with states, local and community governments and decision-making institutions and bodies. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
United States Just Security had a piece “Lawsuit against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:39 pm by Carl Neff
Background This precise issue was addressed in the recent decision of SolarReserve CSP Holdings LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 1:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, in the landmark June 2019 decision of Marchand v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:45 am by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
  Our offices are conveniently located in Miami, Florida (Coral Gables), and service clients throughout the State of Florida. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm by John Floyd
In a 4-2 decision drawn along political lines, the state’s high court overturned the governor’s order and reinstated the April 7 elections. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
Love v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3 is a recent decision of the High Court of Australia that highlights the breadth and blurry edges of our discipline. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:55 pm by admin
This article is a brief discussion of the high court’s age discrimination ruling in Babb v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am by Jay Stanley
United States — we argue that tracking individuals in the way that this technology does is something the government cannot do without a warrant. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:13 am by Jeffrey Kron
In January 2020 the Johannesburg High Court reaffirmed this position in Khum MK Investments and Bie Joint Venture (Pty) Limited v Eskom Holdings Soc. [read post]