Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2022, 10:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied Ohio State University's petition for rehearing en banc in Snyder-Hill v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
In the landmark decision of Obergfell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
The only way to do justice is to provide opportunities for justice. 50 years ago, in Gideon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Tull v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Locke v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
” United States v. $124,570 U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
” United States v. $124,570 U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
Cir. 2014) Download Promega v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:08 pm
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:20 pm
EDNY Judge Weinstein’s much publicized sentencing decision in the securities fraud case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
” The court had no difficulty applying Olmstead to the case, holding that the state had to provide the services in the adult group home where the plaintiff lived, rather than offering them only in a nursing facility.The Ninth Circuit held that DSHS was violating Title II of the ADA by failing to provide long term care in an integrated community setting rather than a nursing home.Olmstead does not require DSHS to increase the number of slots on the HCBS waiting lists (see… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
rejected Plaintiffs' argument that an antitrust stalwart, United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:15 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
., v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm
That distinction was removed last Friday, when Justice Sullivan ruled in Coates v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 am
All rights reservedIn City of Ontario v. [read post]