Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 7401 - 7420 of 42,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Supreme Court granted the Employer's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award, which ruling Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Allie Gottlieb
But who makes the rules matters for the economic well-being of all Americans, especially Black Americans, Brummer argues. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:46 am by Evan Lee
Complicating matters further, Gary claims that Rehaif error should not even be analyzed under Rule 52(b), which covers plain error and puts the burden of proving prejudice on the defendant. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:09 am by Kory A. Crichton
Trial Court The trial court found that there was sufficient evidence that a consultation took place based upon Plaintiff’s certification and the e-mail. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained that the Trustees' Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious, citing Matter of Solomonoff v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 188 AD3d 700. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained that the Trustees' Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious, citing Matter of Solomonoff v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 188 AD3d 700. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:29 am by Rose Hughes
  Legal Background: RPBA 2020 and "ping-pong"The Revised Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020) were introduced in January 2020. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 4:48 am by Grace Yang
Some courts completely ignore any statute of limitations and rule that an employer that cannot produce evidence to show its employee actually took the vacation days at issue must pay for any “unused” vacation days, no matter how long ago. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court is not, um, ruling in this instance that the [respondents'] faith is not heartfelt or dis—dishonest. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
There are Court Rules which have been promulgated by our Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:14 am by INFORRM
On 1 April 2021 the US Supreme Court ruled that the FCC can loosen local media ownership rules. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:55 am by Sandy T. Fox
What that means is that whenever you go to court on a parental responsibility and timesharing matter – before the judge hears any arguments or any evidence – the court begins the process presuming that equal timesharing is the proper timesharing split and is what is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Brittany E. Grierson
Such a finding would be dispositive of the court’s ability to even consider an adverse inference were the evidence electronic in nature and therefore subject to Rule 37(e). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Brittany E. Grierson
Such a finding would be dispositive of the court’s ability to even consider an adverse inference were the evidence electronic in nature and therefore subject to Rule 37(e). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Brittany E. Grierson
Such a finding would be dispositive of the court’s ability to even consider an adverse inference were the evidence electronic in nature and therefore subject to Rule 37(e). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Rules of evidence protect criminal defendants from the introduction of certain prejudicial types of evidence in the prosecution’s case-in-chief, such as evidence of a defendant’s violent character. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am by vforberger
Differences in program rules and definitions allow individuals in certain circumstances to receive overlapping DI and UI benefits without violating eligibility requirements. [read post]