Search for: "Mark"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 151,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2015, 4:13 am
[Refusal to register the mark 1-800-TIRE-911 for vehicle tire repair services and roadside assistance services, on the ground that the mark fails to function as a service mark: i.e., the mark is merely informational and would not be seen as an indicator of source but merely as the means by which customers can contact Applicant].In re Paul Adam’s Trademarks and Patents LLC, Serial No. 85851688 (September 11, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
An applicant who invokes this rule is seeking to "tack" the use of the registered mark to its use of the applied-for mark in order to show that the new mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:22 am
DISH PIZZA” should be viewed in light of its “family” of double word marks with explanation marks. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal of a group of Native Americans challenging the WASHINGTON REDSKINS mark on the grounds that the mark “may disparage … persons, living or dead, … or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Can you guess what mark the NFL will be relying on? [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Join ARC Law Group's Mark Pearson at this year's CMIS. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 8:47 am
Kinda funny that the Canadian trade-mark application for WEB 2.0 was also recently advertised in the Trade-marks Journal. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 4:29 am
The Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt - Apportionment Arrangements) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 The Trade Marks (Earlier Trade Marks) Regulations 2008 The Disease Control (England) (Amendment) Order 2008 The Further Education and Training Act 2007 (Commencement No. 1) (England and Wales) Order 2008 The Transfer of Functions (Miscellaneous) Order 2008 Source: www.opsi.gov.uk [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:59 am
It rings more true if your mark has established remarkable secondary meaning in relevant market where you sell your product or service with that mark. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:13 am
SHOULD IT HAVE BEEN MARK WARNER? [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:13 pm
Ford Motor Co. is recalling more than 650,000 F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT pickup trucks because of a defective power brake assist hose, according to an article on Consumeraffairs.com . [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:56 am
MARK STEYN: AMERICA HAS SQUANDERED ITS OPPORTUNITY TO LEAD: I’ve been alarmed by the latest polls. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm
MARK STEYN: Earthly woes mount as Obama’s rhetoric soars. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:07 am
The Daily Journal is reporting (link unavailable) that Judge Kozinski has hired Kirkland & Ellis’s Mark Holscher to represent him in a pending judicial misconduct inquiry. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 4:46 am
MARK STEYN: Democrats Should Let Sleeping Dogs Lie. “My point is that self-loathing cultural relativism is so deeply ingrained on the left that any revulsion to dog-eating is trumped by revulsion to criticizing any of the rich, vibrant, cultural diversity out there in Indonesia or anywhere else. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
A drawing that includes multiple elements that do not comprise an identifiable mark, or that consists of wording describing the mark, does not constitute a clear drawing of the mark. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Or is it ok once a brand is big enough not to worry with marking it as a brand - because everyone already knows. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board found these two marks likely to cause confusion with Opposer's dog design mark, shown further below, registered and used for various goods and services. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:10 am
Balancing the du Pont factors like a legal hacky-sack, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark LEG BALANCE for "athletic apparel, namely, shirts, singlets, jackets, shorts, tights, running suits, bras, briefs and socks" [LEG disclaimed], finding the mark not likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FOOT BALANCE for "leather boots and shoes. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:07 am
In re Community Trust Bank, Serial No. 76685026 (September 25, 2009) [not precedential].The Board noted the differences in the marks at issue, observing that "[w]ords are more likely to be more significant than the design in a mark. [read post]
