Search for: "Matter of Williams"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 13,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2013, 6:14 am
William Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that! [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
WILLIAM MACREATH, a partner in the well known Glasgow law firm LEVY MCRAE, and also known as the boss of the LEGAL DEFENCE UNION (LDU), had his ‘Human Rights’ violated under article 6 of ECHR by the Law Society of Scotland with regard to an investigation of a client complaint, according to a written opinion from Lord Drummond Young published by the Court of Session. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:48 am
By William W. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:30 am
Jones and William J. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:58 am
By William W. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
GUNN, INDIVIDUALLY, WILLIAMS SQUIRE & WREN..., No. 10-0141 and remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
GUNN, INDIVIDUALLY, WILLIAMS SQUIRE & WREN..., No. 10-0141 and remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
GUNN, INDIVIDUALLY, WILLIAMS SQUIRE & WREN..., No. 10-0141 and remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:57 am
This post was written by William J. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:56 am
If it is simply a matter of introducing into the process some figure in whom the public has unreasoning trust, we might just as plausibly have the president’s targeting decisions reviewed by Oprah. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am
&&& The Commission discussed the views of, inter alia, William L. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:02 pm
Photo Credit: lenetstan/Shutterstock.comJulie Hilden, a Justia columnist, graduated from Yale Law School, practiced First Amendment law at the D.C. law firm of Williams & Connolly from 1996-99 and has been writing about First Amendment issues for over a decade. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm
The Lord of Heaven and Earth will be judge between us in this matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:11 am
During the hearing before the Board, both Williams and Cotton maintained that Teare was terminated for harassing Janik rather than for discussing salary information. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:11 am
During the hearing before the Board, both Williams and Cotton maintained that Teare was terminated for harassing Janik rather than for discussing salary information. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:52 am
Here is the opinion in Williams v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
By: William E. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
By: William E. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:37 am
” Williams, the former CEO, is not named as a defendant in the case. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The second distinction—the need for both Houses of Congress, and not just one, to be involved before legislative standing is allowed—does draw support from the facts of Chadha (and those of Karcher, for that matter, where the leaders of both chambers of the New Jersey legislature intervened to defend), and also from the fact that Article I of the U.S. [read post]
