Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 7401 - 7420 of 30,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm by Anthony Lake
United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935); The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all, and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom (application nos. 60041/08 & 60054/08) – Read judgment / press release (which the case summary below is based on) The European Court of Human Rights is to give the UK a deadline of six months in order to allow prisoners to vote in elections, or it could face significant consequences. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
 June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:32 am by Dan Flynn
The United States v Miller’s Organic Farm and Amos Miller’s next such hearing will be on September 26 At this one, Amos Miller of Bird-in-Hand, PA must have his $305,000 fine paid up or he risks going to jail. [read post]
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant,… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court indicated Friday that it will decide a case that comes close to the very fundamental question of whether justice and a court can be bought. [read post]