Search for: "Register of Copyrights"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 12,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 1:28 am
If you can't register as a trade mark a term which is descriptive, such as a place of origin of goods, why should you be able to protect it as a GI? [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:54 pm
Holzworth writes: Copyright: thommorrisphotography / 123RF Stock PhotoDespite Pennsylvania’s medical marijuana industry being in its infancy, more than 17,000 patients have registered for the program, and more than 4,000 already have received their medical marijuana card from the Department of Health. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Using this feed on any other site is a copyright violation. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
After reviewing the legislative history the Court of Appeal took the view (para [40]) that there was no assistance to be obtained from the relationship between copyright and registered design right. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
If the photograph was timely registered with the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:27 pm
OMS Investments, Inc., Opposition No. 91158240 [Opposition to registration of ANT-STOP for "pesticides for domestic use," on the grounds of abandonment and likelihood of confusion with an alleged family of "STOP" marks for lawn and garden products].August 26, 2009 - 11 AM: In re In re JLG Industries, Inc., Serial No. 76651189 [Section 2(d) refusal to register a color mark (orange and cream) shown left below, in view of the registered color mark (orange) shown… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:35 am
The Board not surprisingly affirmed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register the mark WEIS in the design form shown below, for frozen dairy products. [read post]
13 May 2008, 4:15 am
But there, at least the correct entity was already the party defendant and was the owner of the mark in question.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:01 am
See TBMP Section 528.05(a).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:07 am
However, it dismissed Opposer's dilution claim, noting that because Health Plus failed to prove fame under Section 2(d), it perforce did not meet the higher standard for fame under Section 43(c).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
The judges said a lot more in their 46-page opinion, and I suggest that you read it, if you have lights.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
There, I think Walgreen would prevail.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
A quick, informal survey of a dozen people in my office found only one who knew the idiomatic meaning.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:34 am
I just don't see it.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
I think the problem is that by making the marks look somewhat similar in order to parody the PRL mark, Respondent made them confusingly similar.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:09 am
" The Board found Applicant's mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark LE TIGRE (Stylized) shown immediately below, for various clothing items. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
