Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 14,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
W. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Yet the Supreme Court’s decision last Term in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:04 am
The conviction was affirmed just last Friday, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
When even their favorite son, George W. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:18 pm
Cognex Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
At the First Amendment Center, Tony Mauro reviews OT2011’s First Amendment cases, while Rory Little summarizes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Kelly v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
USDA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:41 am
It’s been six weeks since I reported on NLRB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:41 am
It’s been six weeks since I reported on NLRB v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
Oregon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:26 am
Thus, for example, in People v Syville (15 NY3d 391 [2010])the Court of Appeals held that "[w]here an attorney has failed to comply with a timely request for the filing of a notice of appeal and the defendant alleges that the omission could not reasonably have been discovered within the one-year period, the time limit imposed in CPL 460.30 should not categorically bar an appellate court from considering that defendant's application to pursue an untimely appeal. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:26 am
United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Addressing Plaintiff's argument that the District was liable for the alleged violations of her constitutional rights because it maintained a custom or policy of permitting the Superintendent to make unilateral decisions regarding the enforcement of the District visitor’s policy, in contravention of the written policy placing this authority with school principals, the Circuit Court stated that to establish liability against the District under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Addressing Plaintiff's argument that the District was liable for the alleged violations of her constitutional rights because it maintained a custom or policy of permitting the Superintendent to make unilateral decisions regarding the enforcement of the District visitor’s policy, in contravention of the written policy placing this authority with school principals, the Circuit Court stated that to establish liability against the District under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
