Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
The "additional matters" were: (1) United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
For these reasons, we hold that confirmation of the ICC’s award is not contrary to the public policy of the United States under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
Secretary of United States Army, No. 10-1172 (Dec. 14, 2011). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:26 am
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm
Last week, we filed on behalf of the Legion of Valor of the United States and the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation an amicus brief in the Stolen Valor Act case before the Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
As a matter of our domestic law, we could take the decision in A v United Kingdom into account but nevertheless prefer our own view. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
In short, not even the most radical free marketeers on the Court, Brewer and Peckham, defended anything remotely approaching the laissez-faire jurisprudence advocated by the likes of treatise writer Christopher Tiedeman. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
In short, not even the most radical free marketeers on the Court, Brewer and Peckham, defended anything remotely approaching the laissez-faire jurisprudence advocated by the likes of treatise writer Christopher Tiedeman. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Conscientious objection In a country where conscription has had a relatively short history, it is somewhat surprising that the UK was the first state to legislate for recognition of conscientious objection. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1997)) and state courts (Richardson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:43 am
Schick v. [read post]
