Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 7401 - 7420 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 8:01 am by Clara Spera
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm by Joe Silver
Flickr user: drpavloff The US Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments on Tuesday morning in two companion cases revolving around whether police officers need a warrant to search a suspect's cell phone upon arrest: United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Although it did not come out really plainly in the argument, the Court did seem to sense that there were greater risks to cellphone privacy in the case of a modern smartphone — the kind of device involved in Riley — and a somewhat dated model, the “flip phone,” which is the device at issue in the second case Tuesday, United States v Wurie. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:37 am by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:31 am by Kali Borkoski
California, followed by United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am by Tom Kosakowski
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has unveiled an Ombudsperson Program for attorneys to raise issues about the Court or individual judges. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am by Lyle Denniston
United States is whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s ban on destroying a “tangible object” includes only materials like documents or other records, or also includes a physical object like a fish. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:45 pm by Theodore Harvatin
The United States Supreme has handed down its decision in Navartte v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm by Chuck Peterson
   Once again we see that our right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure finds too few friends in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]