Search for: "State v. Core" Results 7401 - 7420 of 7,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
Máire Ní Shúilleabháin, Dublin, presented on “Habitual Residence in Private International Law: Core Elements and Contextual Variability”. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
It contends that the Department of Justice has failed to carry out its primary function to protect law-abiding citizens by ignoring its core functions: “enforcing our immigration laws, combating domestic and international criminal enterprises, protecting federal civil rights, and combating foreign espionage. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
Written in readable language, each guide explains the core topics in a legal practice area. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am by CodeX
Concepts like fiduciary duty are core to building trust between the providers of critical services and those receiving those services. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:06 pm by Marc Blitz
This may explain, for example, why Justice Robert decided– in his Hague v. [read post]
Both guidelines state that it is good practice to conduct a DPIA in most cases, as it allows employers to determine if and how to carry out monitoring in a way that minimizes the risks of any monitoring activity. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
With Balkin, Alicea characterizes me as a “living constitutionalist” or dangerously close: At its core, living constitutionalism is about forcing the Constitution to conform to the will of the living, whether “the living” is defined as society at large or a subgroup upon whom the living constitutionalist would confer power. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm by Terry Hart
Last year, a district court refused to grant a preliminary injunction after finding that the broadcasters had been unable to distinguish Aereo’s system from a system held not infringing in the earlier Second Circuit decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:41 am by Howard Knopf
However, the Finance Action concerns the same pattern of conduct and core issues as the other actions. [read post]