Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
In Reed v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Srivastava, No. 074386 Order suppressing evidence seized by federal officers from residence and medical offices of doctor-plaintiff is vacated and remanded where: 1) the evidence suppressed was constitutionally seized and within the scope of the search warrants; and 2) the court's blanket suppression of all seized evidence was erroneous. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:11 am
The current state of play, as I understand it, is (1) as to amputees a doctor who performed the surgery might very well lose his license or at least be subject to significant critcism from bioethicists, and the state certainly would not pay for it or allow a tax deduction. (2) As to the trans person in distress, there are many doctors who would perform the surgery and it is generally accepted by medical ethics. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
State, No. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
In Spearman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:02 pm
See Piontek v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:42 am
U.S. (09-479) and Gould v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In Blumenthal v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Dist. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am
” (Hand v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
A doctor noted the same thing. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:37 am
Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
Moore v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
This doctor, Dr. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:57 pm
” Snow v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:10 am
(Scott v. [read post]
