Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7401 - 7420 of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2021, 5:11 pm by Larry
The CIT has “all the powers in law and equity of, or as conferred by statute upon, a district court of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am by SHG
That latter proposition is supported by decisions of this Court, see United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
 Considering DOMA Section 3, federal district judge Joseph Tauro in Gill v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
The minus is due to the wrongheaded decisions of one state supreme court and a federal district court ignoring state precedent, undermining the learned intermediary rule in a couple of smaller states.The A is due to the number of states that have adopted the learned intermediary rule since the mid-1980s. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by Russell Beck
” Delaware: The District of Delaware issued a recent decision (actually, a report and recommendation subject to review by the district court judge) analyzing the standards (under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Both opinions, like Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm by Stephen D. Richman
Oakhurst Dairy While the Cammelleri case dealt with a mere parking ticket, in 2018, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in O’Connor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
" At least in district court. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Silver of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied a motion to exclude evidence of the patent reexamination of the ’894 patent-in-suit in Integrated Technology Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by David Phillips, Kelly Berkell
Supreme Court considered the material support prohibition in Holder v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed, that SeaWorld had violated OSHA’s general duty-clause. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:02 am by Michelle Yeary
Therefore, the district court correctly dismissed the Stengels’ initial complaint.Stengel, slip op. at 4092. [read post]