Search for: "State v. Word" Results 7401 - 7420 of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Erin Napoleon
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm by David Smith
In dismissing an argument put to him he states that he “cannot find it in the words of the statute”. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am by Mavrick Law Firm
”  As the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit stated in Univ. of Florida v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am by Daniel Hemel
Kavanaugh pointed to a 1946 case, Social Security Board v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:32 pm by Guglielmo Verdirame
A state is, in other words, a fact in a normative and social sense. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ilya Somin
The main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Similarly, in Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division ruled that a CBA provision that allowed a teacher to be absent with pay on "any of the religious holidays designated by the New York State Commissioner of Education" without charging his or her absence to leave credits violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held  in  Rivera  v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:30 am
We generally pull a dogeared copy of Wilson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:29 pm by David Greene
But other courts, and some state laws, believe the First Amendment only requires that an objectively reasonable person would perceive the statement to be a threat of violence.The Supreme Court is considering a case called Counterman v. [read post]