Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The Strategy demonstrates a strong commitment by the Administration to further enhance the country’s cybersecurity posture. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
That Act stated that, i [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
That Act stated that, i [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
”As in those constitutional contexts, here, federal removal involves the accommodation of competing legal and social values—Congress’s goal of protecting federal officials from unfair state prosecuting versus the “strong judicial policy” against imposing “extraordinary burdens on the States. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
Judge Koeltl noted however that quantitative considerations alone were not determinative, adding that “sufficiently strong qualitative evidence of materiality can establish materiality as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:54 pm
In the present case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
And, in Locke v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in CNH Industrial N.V. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am
Swatch, S.A. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
Hull -- included a strong 29-page dissent by Hull, who said that the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Is there room for a "strong" approach? [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm
Strong and majestic, Reign for glory, For our glory! [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
As Scalia noted in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
(a)) and the court sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison”, he appealed. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 8:11 pm
The case of Kennedy v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Marsh (2006)), let states limit capital juries to strong death penalty supporters (Uttecht v. [read post]
