Search for: "The Examiner"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 161,940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
The deletion of these features in appeal proceedings does not address, let alone overcome, the objections raised by the ED and reverts the claimed subject-matter to that examined at a much earlier stage of the examination proceedings. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) refusing its patent application.In a first communication (June 23, 2006) the Examiner made a novelty objection based on D1. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
NYCLA Forum to Examine U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
The Board therefore adopted the ordinary and customary meaning offered by the Examiner. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 2:43 pm
Hagins appears to indicate that examinations will have such focus. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
He would reverse on the ground that the Examining Attorney did not make out a prima facie case.Judge Zervas pointed to Section 1207.01 of the TMEP, which requires the Examining Attorney to provide evidence "showing that the goods and services are related to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
The OIG report’s objective was to determine “whether and to what extent OCIE examiners were frustrated in matters other than Stanford where Enforcement did not pursue cases identified by examiners in the SEC regional offices. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 1:51 pm
 In these examinations, according to Ms. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:51 am
By "taking official notice", an Examiner may rely on facts beyond the record to reject claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellant argued that the ED was not precluded from reopening examination proceedings up to the moment at which the decision was handed over to the internal postal service, and cited the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, C-VI, 14.4. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:52 am
UPDATE: For discussion of the Federal Register Notice see USPTO Announces New Examination Rules, Seeks Comment on 33 Questions. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The United States Patent and Trademark Office is seeking public comment on a major new patent examination initiative that would provide applicants greater control over the speed with which their applications are examined and promote greater efficiency in the patent examination process. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
"[B]iases and motivations to lie" constitute a mighty broad "area of inquiry"; I wonder how often a judge ever forecloses cross-examination of it. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:38 am
In this blog post, we examine the private right of action available under the Act, including how it interacts with the state’s Consumer Protection Act and the risk of class actions. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:48 am
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: More from The Examiner: It may not be possible for Democratic leaders in Congress to look even more ridiculous on earmarks reform than they do now but theyâ € ™re doing their best. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:52 pm
Press release: Texas eDiscovery Vendor Adds Fourth Forensic Certified Examiner Dallas, TX and Fort Worth, TX, January 16, 2007 - Litigation Solution, Inc., a regional leader in litigation support services including computer forensics, electronic discovery, document imaging, and trial support services for law firms and corporate legal departments, today announced that Malcolm Wells has achieved certification as a "Certified Computer Examiner" (CCE) by the International… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:51 pm
” The Patent Examiner appreciates this. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:21 pm
The issue is devoted to a re-examination of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) by assorted luminaries from Delaware as well as those from New York and elsewhere who spend more time in Delaware Chancery Court fighting about the nuances and meaning of the DGCL than many Delaware lawyers do. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 8:24 am
., A-2707-08T3, January 8, 2010: “Generally, it is improper for a court to decide a case in reliance on an expert opinion without allowing the parties to examine the expert. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 2:11 am
The following e-mail was received by the library on February 6, 2007:
We are in the process of adding historical Manual of Patent Examining Procedure content to HeinOnline, but we need your help.While we do have much of the material needed we have been unable to locate hardcopy of the following:
FROM THE 1ST EDITION:
Revisions:
1 (Nov. 1950)2 (Dec. 1951)
3 (May 1952) FROM THE 2ND EDITION:
Revisions:
1 (Jan. 1964)
7 (Jan.… [read post]
