Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 7401 - 7420 of 11,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am by Steve Baird
This is an interesting point of reliance since one third party BEYOND mark is registered under Section 66A of the Lanham Act (under the Madrid Protocol), the other is registered under Section 44(e) of the Lanham Act (based on a Canadian registration), where there is no evidence of any use in the United States required for either registration, and since the court’s decision does not reference the actual use of either third party BEYOND mark in the U.S.,… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
”  And at Reuters, Mark Miller explains that “there could be real problems [for Medicare] if the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Nordwind, 584 F.3d at 432-33 (quotation marks omitted); accord Amadasu v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Among other matters, it will consider the implications of the Court’s grant of review in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:21 am by Howard Wasserman
SEIU--are the only two cases still undecided from the January sitting, and U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:21 am by Howard Wasserman
SEIU--are the only two cases still undecided from the January sitting, and U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
National Australia Bank, in which the Court held that U.S. securities laws do not apply to investment deals that occur outside the country, even if they have a domestic impact or effect. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 2:45 am by Orly Lobel
But in the U.S., I don't think it had been widely read. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:56 am by Brian Wolfman
We posted earlier about the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Freeman v. [read post]