Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
More recently, as in the past two years, the dangerous bath salts have jumped the Atlantic and taken the United States by storm. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Second, they could be forfeited under 19 USC 1497(a)(1) because there was no declaration of entry made on any customs form when imported into the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
”The September 30 complaint in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
LEXIS 11373February 4, 2011, Decided February 4, 2011, Filed And UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 2011 U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:30 am
With a user base larger than the United States if it were a country, Facebook is in a unique position to shape much of the social Web, even if that includes shuttering smaller, niche competitors along the way. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
But given that Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
(The IP Factor) Japan Japan to sign ACTA this weekend (Michael Geist) Poland A letter of consent and something more (Class 46) South East Asia Patent protection in the ASEAN region (Foreign Filing Blog) Switzerland Acquiescence not a factor in opposition proceedings (Class 46) United Kingdom Copyright in court judgments: a matter of access (1709 Copyright Blog) SuperGroup: Fashion, recession and IP (IPKat) Damages cap now in place (PatLit) PCC Page 39: The… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The concept of adverse possession was subsequently adopted in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Regardless, the quote suggests itself as the inspiration behind the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California‘s charging decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Continuing, the Court stated that the data did not show a marked increase in the percent of cases with punitive damage awards. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:51 am
In last week’s case (Wong-Lai v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
