Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 9,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
A search of the defendant’s car after he was arrested and in police custody was unconstitutional under Arizona v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
Bruce will be most remembered as the co-founder, along with David Wexler of the University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
Supreme Court — U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
We reiterate our supreme court's previous holding that a waiver of the privilege against self-incrimination may not be made a condition of probation. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am
Arizona lawsuit — federal trial court is a proper place for it to be, and then eventually it might get to the Supreme Court through the Court’s appellate jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
What could be described as the “where did the summer go” edition of the weekly is now online: Leading off this edition is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:00 pm
JUDGES, ACADEMICS AND PRACTICING LAWYERS GATHER FOR YEARLY CONFERENCE The 2010 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference took place last week in Maui, Hawaii with United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony M. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:00 pm
JUDGES, ACADEMICS AND PRACTICING LAWYERS GATHER FOR YEARLY CONFERENCEThe 2010 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference took place last week in Maui, Hawaii with United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony M. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:11 am
Where plaintiffs were in privity of contract with the defendant-design professional, the Indiana Supreme Court cited Arizona and Nevada opinions in finding no justifiable distinction for applying the Economic Loss Doctrine to contractors while allowing tort claims against design professionals. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court on Monday released the schedule of oral arguments to be heard in the two-week session that begins on Monday, Nov. 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Blawg Review is a blog carnival that rotates to a different law site every week, usually emphasizing a specific theme. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court answered that question definitively in the 1982 case, Pyler v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
” Related posts:Supreme Court to Review Arizona’s 2007 Employer Law Challenge to Redskins Name Reaches Supreme Court Immigrants and Nazis, Communists and Cardinals [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
A group of Arizona taxpayers, in a new filing in the Supreme Court, has suggested that the Justices consider avoiding a ruling in a major case on tuition tax credits for parents of parochial school students, at least until the impact of a new Arizona state law has been assessed, first by lower courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:30 pm
It identifies several causes, including the cyclical nature of our judicial system, creating a ripple effect; the tendency of courts to emulate the Supreme Court; and our overemphasis on words, phrases, and quotations. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
Arizona – in which the federal government challenges the constitutionality of Arizona’s new laws relating to illegal immigration – was not filed at the Supreme Court from the outset. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
The UEP trust holds almost all the property in the twin FLDS towns of Hilldale, Utah and Colorado City, Arizona. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
Arizona — the case in which the U.S. is challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s law dealing with illegal immigrants — hasn’t been filed from the outset before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
