Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 7421 - 7440 of 40,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 10:30 am by Jason Kelley
  An 84-year-old elder of a village shot dead by police while defending his and the villagers' land. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, as alleged in the Complaint, Defendants’ decision does not constitute malpractice. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The exemption does not apply when a defendant “speaks of other goods or services in the marketplace,” i.e., goods or services that the speaker does not sell or lease. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
We’re a small and flexible team where everyone does a little bit of everything, but your primary job on a daily basis will be conducting research and policy advocacy at the intersection of technology, data protection, and equity. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
In the 2 months since this ruling, the litigants have kept their guns ablazin’, so it’s doubtful the judge will get his wish. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:00 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  In order to demonstrate Article III standing, Plaintiffs must show they: ‘(1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision’ . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  The High court ruled that the defendant’s statements were not defamatory and declined FBC’s claims for damages and loss of business revenue and profits. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The plea colloquy does not establish that Bianco acted with improper intent, and the district court did not make such a finding. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
On January 31, 2020, defendant notified Doe that it was initiating a Title IX investigation against him as a result of that incident. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
McGahn for asserting immunity” and that the “criminal contempt of Congress statute does not apply. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Antell clearly failed to meet this test, since the complaint is devoid of any mention of a breach by defendants of their duty to him, the standard of care owed to him by the defendants, or proximate cause. 2 Nor does Antell allege that the defendants were negligent. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am by Sophie Corke
While it can be tempting to draw many different kinds of relationship under the umbrella of ‘fiduciary duties’, this does not make the nature or scope of the duties owed in each individual circumstance identical. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Recital (2) to the EU Regulation, despite mentioning suffering being induced “by negligence or intention”, does not affect the wording of article 3(1). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
“But just because California law prohibits private plaintiffs from forcing defendants to substantiate their advertising claims, that does not mean California law prohibits those plaintiffs from attacking defendants’ substantiation. [read post]