Search for: "Doe" Results 7421 - 7440 of 546,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 5:03 pm
On this reading, Nixon and Cheney support the conventional wisdom: a criminal trial uniquely calls for judicial override of executive privilege in a way that a dispute between the President and Congress does not.Yet the cases hardly compel that result, and there is sound policy basis for thinking nearly the opposite. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:01 pm by Silver Law Group
Now to the question of the hour: How does a mandatory arbitration contract impact my ability to be a whistleblower? [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Moreover, “As for the associational ‘interest’ in selecting the candidate of a group to which one does not belong, that falls far short of a constitutional right, if indeed it can even fairly be characterized as an interest. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:25 am
"An ITC determination does not become final for purposes of judicial review until the president has either approved of the determination or failed to disapprove within 60 days," the court said. #2. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:07 pm by Steve Smith
Unfortunately for consumers, the FDA does not monitor or regulate hexane residue in foods and according to the report by the Cornucopia Institute, veggie burgers aren't the only products containing hexane. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:39 am
In particular, Katz and his co-author note that (1) a saturation effect as broadband penetration reaches high levels nationally might limit broadband's economic impact, (2) broadband can generate increases in productivity that can actually reduce jobs (something which in normal times would be an efficiency gain, but which would run counter to the job-creation goals of the stimulus package), (3) broadband enables the outsourcing of jobs, which can also reduce jobs in the area targeted for… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm by Neil Weinreb
  Therefore, courts are reluctant to enter an order that does not provide for child support. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Does the permanent change to "portability" that you have discussed in your columns on estate and gift taxes apply here? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:55 am by WKZ
After much debate in the fall of 2010 the NCAA finally relented and allows student-athletes the ability to obtain such coverage, where they miss the boat is that they prohibit student-athletes and their families the ability to get loans based on future earnings to pay for these premiums.As a result, the ability for an elite college football player to insure against an injury that doesn’t qualify as total disability but does hamper their pro potential are priced outside of their means.… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
  Does the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment also include the freedom not to speak? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:29 am by Law Offices of Scott David Stewart
  Resource Bloomberg Businessweek: Infidelity Rises When She Makes More Than He Does (8/16/2010) [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by autumn
 This holding is in line with the 3rd DCA, but does conflict with other courts. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:03 am by David M. Boertje
Simply being charged with a crime does not mean that there has been a conviction. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 7:28 am by François Fontaine and Charles-Antoine
The Court found that when privileged information is disclosed, the scope of any privilege waiver depends on the context – disclosing to one does not waive privilege with respect to all. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:05 am
I tend to agree with him, but I also have the impression that the German public does not worry about terrorist attacks in general. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:28 pm by Mark Zamora
The American Heart Association warns of severe and life-threatening side effects and does not endorse chelation as a treatment for heart disease. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 By way of example, today's thumbnail image, Ed Ruscha's "Large Trademark with Eight Spotlights," (a painting of the 20th Century Fox logo), does not infringe under trademark law because Ruscha is not using the mark to sell anything (other than the art work itself). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
  t said that the suppressed evidence "does not rise to the level of materiality that would be likely to cause a different result at a new trial. [read post]