Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm
Of course it does! [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 3:42 pm
Table 1: Types of Cabinet Secretaries by Administration President Confirmed Recess Acting (at least 10 days) Reagan 33 1 25 (11) Bush 41 (1 term) 20 1 20 (16) Clinton 28 1 27 (11) Bush 43 34 0 22 (13) Obama 32 0 23 (14) Trump (2.5 years) 21 0 28 (25) Presidents must use some acting secretaries at the start of their administrations (and at the beginning of second terms) while the traditional appointments process churns. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:07 am
Or, it could mean that it does not exist. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Id. at 4-5, 7, 20-22.FDA PMA involves rigorous review of the adequacy of product labeling/warnings. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
This final rebuttal ended the vigorous exchange with my colleague (who, to clarify, does not teach at American University). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan, No. 08-1 0 100 (1 1th Cir. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Slip op. at 20. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:27 am
As of July 1, 2016, lobbyists did not have to report any spending below $100 per lawmaker. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:15 pm
The Family Court scheduled that hearing for September 1, 2009, although the hearing was ultimately adjourned until June 28, 2010. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 34 (1988) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
So in litigation, no one says “the Office has done this 20 times before. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:43 pm
Instead, the important element of Volume 1 is the discussion of “Russian government links to and contacts with the Trump campaign”—or the possibility of what some might describe as “collusion. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
Here are some brief and quite preliminary suggestions:1. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
Where analysis is lacking, shareholders are often left with a pages-long discussion that is heavy on process but does not explain the reasons why. [read post]
25 May 2018, 7:45 am
The bill does not amend the current Article 5. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
Id. at 419-20. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Here, it is undisputed that, when RSA defended, it did not know of the fact of consumption of alcohol prior to the accident, which fact, if known, would have demonstrated policy breach. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
As a result, “if a defendant has intercepted a claimant’s voice messages … even where there is a significant preponderance of plainly non-confidential messages, he should nonetheless disclose them as part of the overall disclosure exercise” [56] Lord Neuberger therefore concluded that the disclosure orders of Mann and Vos JJ should be upheld. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
“Here, petitioners seek to analogize Google’s algorithmic recommendation of others’ content to cases involving a defendant’s own speech or conduct. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
And while the business judgment rule should protect decisions of this nature from undue interference by the courts, in the “20/20 hindsight” world of stockholder litigation, it never hurts to spell out what is otherwise an inference. [read post]
