Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 8:44 pm
Lo plantearon en el acuerdo, y salió esto: reúnanse ustedes y preparen un voto común, con lo mÃÂnimo indispensable, y después que cada uno haga todo el voto concurrente que quiera, si no no lo sacamos más". [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Sabol, No. 06-2692 Grant of petitions for habeas corpus is reversed where the Bureau of Prisons rule denying placement in a community corrections center to all prisoners during the first ninety percent of their sentences was a reasonable exercise of the BOP's discretion in carrying out its duties under 18 U.S.C. section 3621(b). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:00 am
(Section 10(a) (2)(B)(v).) [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:20 pm
Protecting the food chain from BSE, E. coli, Salmonella and Crohn's also seems to make sense. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
This opened the door and the Court saw nothing improper in the prosecutor's treatment of the issue on re-direct.Inadmissible Hearsay: The Court noted the four elements that determine whether W.R.E. 801(d)(1)(B) applied. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
This opened the door and the Court saw nothing improper in the prosecutor's treatment of the issue on re-direct.Inadmissible Hearsay: The Court noted the four elements that determine whether W.R.E. 801(d)(1)(B) applied. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
., rejected "aiding and abetting liability" under 10b-5 (b). [12, 13] In that 1994 case, the Supreme Court overruled every Circuit Court in finding that no private liability attached to those aiding or abetting violations of Rule 10b-5 (b), which the Court interpreted to require actual misstatements or failure to disclosure coupled with a duty to disclose; that is, there is no secondary liability under 10b-5(b). [14, 15] Parties bringing scheme liability… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:15 pm
It's an easy source to link to our blog and e-mail address for our podcast is hullandhull@gmail.com. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:45 pm
Here's a brief synopsis: (1) Amount of Life Insurance: The amount of life insurance you need will depend on the use(s) for the insurance. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 12:46 pm
Citizens Bank of Mass., 127 S.Ct. 1105 (2007).Jordan E. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 9:51 am
You [b]know[b] you are dead and it's too late. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:03 am
When you lose at roulette or keno, though, you're out only a couple of bucks (if you're smart), and that's the end of it. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
We met Florida's Judge Michael E. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Mukasey, No. 07-2215 "Petition for review of a final order of removal, arising from a conviction for petitioner's grabbing a police officer's fingers and twisting them, is granted and the matter remanded where the BIA's finding that petitioner's state crime of "aggravated battery of a peace officer" was a crime of moral turpitude, was based on a misapprehension of Illinois law. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 2:37 am
Thanks to the TTABlog for pointing out In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., Serial No. 78694122 (February 1, 2008) where the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:49 am
In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., Serial No. 78694122 (February 1, 2008) [precedential].TTABlogger in Normandy (2005)Well, I doubt you would have guessed the first one: Applicant failed to comply with the PTO's requirement under Rule 2.61(b) for further information as to the geographic origin of the mark. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Sure, we'd love it if one or more of the Supreme Court's opinions in pending cases were to do away with the Lohr language altogether, but we're not holding our breath. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
Rather the real competition is either: (a) Outlook, or (b) the status quo - just doing nothing at all. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
