Search for: "JOHN DOE-1" Results 7421 - 7440 of 14,288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 1:48 am by Bob Kraft
  What makes you feel better, what makes you feel worse, what does not affect your symptoms at all? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm by Margaret Wood
  For Home Alone the legal issue would be at what age, if any, does Illinois state law allow children to be home alone. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:35 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Rule 2.72(a)(2) provides that a Section 1(a) applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark." [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Put a different way, does a prostitute commit a hate crime because she targets johns?? [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Apple, which could easily have settled the case but refused to do so because it does not believe that it did anything improper, lost in a bench trial before Judge Denise Cote of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
In a 2-to-1 decision, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that various NCAA Football Video games made by Electronic Arts (EA) did not sufficiently transform Hart’s identity. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Two keys to licensing model: (1) clarity on what user gets, (2) respect for user. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
The Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals held (2-1) that the trial court had committed reversible error. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee's appointment does have a genuine statutory problem. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
That counterclaim says that that the commercial use of the song does not qualify as a fair use and that the company owes them profits, damages and lawyers’ fees for their use. [read post]