Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 7421 - 7440 of 29,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Trading Technologies sued eSpeed and Ecco for infringing 6,772,132 & 6,766,304, which go to displaying "static price levels" on a computerized board for commodity trading. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
9-13-2008 Massachusetts:BOSTON - Citing a possible gap in state law, a state Appeals Court judge on Friday threw out the conviction of a homeless sex offender in Greenfield for failing to notify authorities that he moved to a new residence.Claude Bolling, a "Level 3" sex offender - meaning he is considered by the state to be at high risk of re-offending - registered his permanent address as "the streets of Greenfield" to comply with the… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:17 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
This is within an employer’s rights, but laws at the federal level and in many states, including New Jersey, set strict limits. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
However, Eeva disagreed, stating that in her view the ETSI principle was to license end products and that was how IPR holders had always understood it. [read post]
The Court of the European Union (EU General Court) Wednesday released its judgement in Apple v EUIPO – Swatch, a court case that involved Swatch’s “Tick Different” slogan. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:05 pm
  Specifically, today I received a copy of a "Brief of Amici Curaie" in US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:33 am
In early July of 2006, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued an opinion, Logansport School Corporation v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Of note, these decisions run parallel to developments at the federal level whereby the fate of judicial deference to federal agency interpretation of certain regulations is pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]