Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 45,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Board granted the petition of adidas AG for cancellation of two registrations owned by the Christian Faith Fellowship Church for the mark ADD A ZERO, in standard character and design form, for "clothing, namely shirts and caps," finding that the Church had not used the marks in commerce prior to the filing date of the underlying applications. adidas AG v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
It’s not Young’s bottom line, however, that marks his effort as important. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Courts have been strictly applying this language.In Affordable Roofing v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:14 am
Read the decision at: Burke v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
To illustrate the possibilities, I will take a fresh look at Muscarello v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
In Ames v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
In the trucking accident case of Carson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:32 am
On December 10, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Mayorkas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:46 am
" RxD Media, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Emond v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am
Relevant to this holding was the Court's finding that the prosecutor had a history of racially-discriminatory juror selection practices in this case.The case is Flowers v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 3:05 am
Edison Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:38 pm
Mull v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
One line of that authority holds that anyone can claim recklessness in any case whatsoever regardless of the facts presented.Under a second line of authority, such as those decisions out of Monroe County and other counties, trial court judges are heeding to the well-settled principle that Pennsylvania is a fact-pleading state and that sufficent facts of an outrageous nature are necessary to support claims of recklessness in a personal injury Complaint.In his recentl decision… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:11 am
AMETEK CTS US, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
In Fire Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:06 am
" Ekster Holding B.V. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
" Section 3 of Local Law 198-2011 provides that, "Appendix A to this Ordinance may have individual line items in it stayed by Executive Order. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:37 am
When I read it myself for the first time, I immediately thought of a line a U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:14 am
The case, now titled Information and Privacy Commissioner v. [read post]
