Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
The court found that although the provisions of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:27 pm
") Rhino Sports v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
– IPO consultation (Class 99) Reform of IP taxation – consultation underway (IP finance) The PCC Page no.8: Last chance to make your voice heard – consultation on the proposed limit on recoverable damages in the Patents County Court (PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches Twitter account (Patent Docs) US Patent Reform ‘Patent reform’ still possible in 2010?!? [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:21 pm
That's not a barrier to federal prosecution; the infamous Gun-Free School Zones Act case, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
Meyer stated that the purpose of the interview was to establish [Rogozin]'s admissibility into the United States, and to prevent the entry of contraband such as child pornography. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
The Pentagon Papers were, for those who need a refresher, a top-secret study of the United States involvement in Vietnam during the years 1945-1967. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
But a year later, as people I talked to said uniformly, those media reports were “exaggerated and overblown,” and “we are all on the same page,” “united now to win. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
(See United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
In the case of United Asset Management v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
For the first time in history, three women sit concurrently on the United States Supreme Court, a fourth recently retired. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
Assocs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am
The 9th Circuit explained that it had reached the same conclusion in interpreting similar language in other criminal statutes: In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:06 pm
If I can trust my statistics tools, I have had about 9.500 visitors so far, mainly form the United States (20,9%), Germany (19,0%), United Kingdom (7,6%) Japan (7,3%) and Holland (6,4%). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:30 am
See the seminal case in this area (Winterwerp v The Netherlands). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/15/08-30360.pdf United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Most importantly, it was this principle that drove the United States Supreme Court to famously observe in Wilko v. [read post]
