Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
([C]ompare People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In fact, in other similar situations, there are typically low levels of actual fraud. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:54 pm
Lund v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm
It is to be noted that the key is whether the defendant has been afforded an opportunity to refute those aggravating factors which may have negatively influenced the court as held in People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
Patents are on people's minds. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:00 pm
At the same time, there is a lot of historical recovery work to do and not that many people doing it, and it seems to me okay for all those interested in such projects to pitch in. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:06 pm
It should be noted that a SORA proceeding is civil in nature as held in People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
If you’d like to keep up the level of suspense, you’ll want to scroll quickly past the summary list. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am
It contended that her supervisors detailed the employee to the ARD Fisheries position because they wanted a skilled communicator, leader, and partnership builder in order to make the Fisheries more relevant at the national level. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court in Koushal fails to respect this fundamental judicial duty at so many levels that it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the Court seems to be voting, not adjudicating. [read post]
