Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 8,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 7:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
Hat tip to DW, who pointed me to a recently-issued order in Societe Cooperative Vigneronne Des Grandes Caves Richon-Lezion and Zicron-Jacob Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:20 pm
Then along comes this case, Cooper v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:01 am
Ct. 2382, 2386 (1991); see also United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png In a pyramid scheme case, the First Circuit affirms the limitation of defense cross-examination of a prosecution witness about the nature of the charges against the witness currently pending in state court; trial judge properly allowed defense to raise only the probative aspect of the extrinsic evidence (about the possible motivation of the witness to ingratiate himself with the government by cooperating in the pyramid scheme prosecution),… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
Anonymous v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
", are treated as part of the name, if there are variant spellings of a person's name, choose the form found in the first resource received (cataloged), for compound surnames, refer to IFLA's "Names of persons…" Abbreviations will be replaced by fully spelled out words and phrases: v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am
Here’s a link to the case mentioned earlier, Painter v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
See Miller, 335 F.3d at 899; United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Cooper, et al., v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:51 am
The Arizona Supreme Court noted, however, that “[t]he United States Supreme Court ultimately rejected the federal death knell doctrine in Coopers & Lybrand v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
Back in 1985 the United Kingdom and Ireland made an agreement to cooperate to reconcile the two communities in Northern Ireland. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
McDonough et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:25 am
Attorney General Roy Cooper, who defended the state law in the case, declined to comment on the ruling.... [read post]
