Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7421 - 7440
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
The General Court also rejected the Board of Appeal's ruling that, according to settled case-law, surnames are more distinctive than first names.In doing so the Court referred to its previous decisions and to the Court of Justice's judgment in Case C-379/12P Arav v H.Eich and OHIM, explaining that it is not possible to draw a general rule that is valid throughout the entire EU from the consideration that, in part of the EU, surnames have a more… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
But he will now venture into the lion's den and suggest that perhaps they are all incorrect. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 6:10 pm
But if an Ontario case, Leibel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
" Hanf v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:15 pm
Here: See also, e.g., Robert B. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:47 am
”, I discussed the case of Maeker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
If A sends a letter to B, asking him to deliver a package to C at a particular address, the contents of that letter are contents from A to B but mere non-content addressing information with respect to the delivery of the package to C. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
§ 71(b)(1), (c)(1)-(2). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
P. 166a(b), (c); Frost Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
There is nothing to see but a short-term "fix" that (a) emasculates the Book of Common Prayer; (b) reverses the normal order for liturgical change; and (c) makes a mishmash of the concept of "marriage" within the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
" The court set out the standards under Texas law for third party beneficiary status:(a) the claimant was not privy to the written agreement between the insured and insurer; (b) the contract was made at least in part for the claimant's benefit; and (c) the contracting parties intended for the claimant to benefit by the written agreement. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
The much-awaited Elonis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:43 am
B. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:24 am
Supreme Court today decided the Facebook threats case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:02 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:02 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 6:34 am
It is styled, Jaw The Point, L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:02 am
What it actually says is that a literary work includes "(b) a computer program; [and] (c) preparatory design material for a computer program. [read post]
