Search for: "State v. Country" Results 7421 - 7440 of 26,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
”  That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
(v)               Consent may be revoked or withdrawn any time before or during the act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by Theodore Harvatin
Recently, the United States Supreme Court held this right to include the right to be free from warrantless blood tests, in Birchfield v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
On top of that, both countries are allowed up to 800 deployed and nondeployed launchers and heavy bombers. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm by Hadley Baker
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am by Dáire McCormack-George
Among other things, the ENP requires the development and implementation of country-specific action plans on an annual basis. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:32 am by Frederico Mello
Cristalia used the expert report and civil procedure rules to state that it would be illegal to decide a case against the evidence produced. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
v=dwTQ_U3p5Wc&t=334s and scientific literature at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917305268 or  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2489204/. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]